George Crossley - Revision history

Mouser: /* Sources */ Added note about long S

2015-06-24T12:59:56Z

‎Sources: Added note about long S

Mouser: Added marriage location to life events table

2015-06-24T03:40:00Z

Added marriage location to life events table

Mouser: /* Sources */ Added marriage record source.

2015-06-24T03:38:42Z

‎Sources: Added marriage record source.

Mouser: /* Research */ Added dead-end research note

2012-10-06T03:45:29Z

‎Research: Added dead-end research note

Mouser: /* Research */ more data

2012-04-15T17:34:37Z

‎Research: more data

Mouser: /* Research */ more research note.

2012-04-15T17:33:56Z

‎Research: more research note.

Mouser: /* Sources */ added research notes

2012-04-15T17:32:42Z

‎Sources: added research notes

Mouser: /* Sources */ Removed 1871 census, wrong guy.

2012-03-17T22:01:56Z

‎Sources: Removed 1871 census, wrong guy.

Mouser: /* Sources */ Added 1871 England census

2012-03-17T22:00:16Z

‎Sources: Added 1871 England census

Mouser: Initial writeup based on daughter's page.

2012-03-17T21:49:50Z

Initial writeup based on daughter's page.

New page

__NOTOC__
{| class="wikitable"
! || Date || Location || Notes || Sources
|-
| '''Birth''' || || || || <sup class="reference"></sup>
|-
| '''Marriage''' || || || To [[Jane Vickerstaffe]] ||<sup class="reference"></sup>
|-
| '''Death''' || || || || <sup class="reference"></sup>
|}

= Ancestry chart segment =

''Generation 4'' ''Generation 5'' ''Generation 6''

+-- [[John Forster]]
| (????-????)
+-- [[George Crossley]] --+
| (????-????) |
[[Elizabeth Crossley]] --+ +-- [[Sarah Crossley]]
(~1839-1871) | (????-????)
+-- [[Jane Vickerstaffe]]
(????-????)

Sources: <sup class="reference"></sup>

=Children=
(children with [[Jane Vickerstaffe]])
{| class="wikitable"
! Name || Gender || Date of Birth || Birthplace || Spouse || Notes || Sources

|-
| [[Elizabeth Crossley]]|| F || 1839 || Ireland || || ||<sup class="reference"></sup>

|}

=Places of Residence=
{| class="wikitable"
! Location || Dates || Notes || Sources

|-
| || || ||<sup class="reference"></sup>

|}

= Sources =
{| class="wikitable"
! Ref. Num. !! Description !! Image of original

|-
! '''4'''
| '''Personal Records''' of [[Lois L. Robertson]].
| <div width="*" style="text-align: center">'''N/A'''</div>

|-
! '''6'''
| '''Personal communication''' from [[Peter N. Robertson]].
| <div width="*" style="text-align: center">'''N/A'''</div>

|}

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 |-
 ! '''3'''
-| '''Marriage Record''' from Manchester at St. Mary's, Lancaster Co., England, includes an entry for [[George Crossley|George Crofsley]], bachelor, and [[Jane Vickerstaff]], spinster, married in the church on 31 Jan 1836.
+| '''Marriage Record''' from Manchester at St. Mary's, Lancaster Co., England, includes an entry for [[George Crossley]], bachelor, and [[Jane Vickerstaff]], spinster, married in the church on 31 Jan 1836.  Note the use of the "long s" in old English when using an S in the middle of a word which gives it the look of a cursive lower-case f, or "Crofsley" (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s]).
 | [[File:Marriage Record George Crossley Jane Vickerstaffe.jpg|50px|center]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 6 October 2012
Line 66:		Line 66:

	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com for Devon, Revelstoke, District 4, showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously. There are already some questions about George's parents, in that he seems to have taken his mother's maiden name rather than his father's name (again, according to the Robertson research).		* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com for Devon, Revelstoke, District 4, showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously. There are already some questions about George's parents, in that he seems to have taken his mother's maiden name rather than his father's name (again, according to the Robertson research).
		+
		+	* Along the same lines, there is an 1851 England Census, for Yorkshire, Leeds, Wortley, district 2b, pg. 15, showing John Cropley(Crosley?), 48, and Sarah Cropley(Crosley?), 44, with a son George Cropley, 12. Again, far too young to be our George.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 15 April 2012
Line 65:		Line 65:
	=Research=		=Research=

−	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously. There are already some questions about George's parents, in that he seems to have taken his mother's maiden name rather than his father's name (again, according to the Robertson research).	+	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com for Devon, Revelstoke, District 4, showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously. There are already some questions about George's parents, in that he seems to have taken his mother's maiden name rather than his father's name (again, according to the Robertson research).

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 15 April 2012
Line 65:		Line 65:
	=Research=		=Research=

−	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously.	+	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously. There are already some questions about George's parents, in that he seems to have taken his mother's maiden name rather than his father's name (again, according to the Robertson research).

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 15 April 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:

	\|}		\|}
		+
		+
		+	=Research=
		+
		+	* There is an 1861 England Census record available on ancestry.com showing John Forster, 48?, and his wife Sarah Forster, 53, with a son George, 10. This is clearly too young to be our George, whose daughter is said to have been born in 1839. I only list this here because I don't have any information about where the Robertson research came up with the John and Sarah names for George's parents, and it's possible that they came from this source erroneously.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 | '''Birth'''  ||  ||  || || <sup class="reference"></sup>
 |-
-| '''Marriage''' ||  ||  || To [[Jane Vickerstaffe]] ||<sup class="reference"></sup>
+| '''Marriage''' || 31 Jan 1836 || Manchester at St. Mary's Church, Lancaster Co., England || To [[Jane Vickerstaffe]] ||<sup class="reference"></sup>
 |-
 | '''Death''' ||  ||  ||  || <sup class="reference"></sup>

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 |-
-! '''4'''
+! '''1'''
 | '''Personal Records''' of [[Lois L. Robertson]].
 | <div width="*" style="text-align: center">'''N/A'''</div>
 |-
-! '''6'''
+! '''2'''
 | '''Personal communication''' from [[Peter N. Robertson]].
 | <div width="*" style="text-align: center">'''N/A'''</div>
-|}
+|-
 =Research=

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ! Ref. Num. !! Description !! Image of original
-|-
-! '''1'''
-| '''1871 England Census''' for Yorkshire, Leeds, North Leeds, District 61, Page 2 lists [[John Crossley]], 44, as head of household.  His wife, Sarah (44), son [[George Crossley|George]] (18), daughter Sarah Ann (17), son Edward (15), daughter Emma (14), Son Waller (11), daughter Elizabeth (9), daughter Harriett (8), son Charles (3), and daughter Annie (1) are also present.  They live at 83 Green Rd.  John is a "Wollen(?) Warehouseman."  George is a machine fitter at yorks.  Sarah Ann is a cloth cap maker.   Edward is a book laster at yorks.  Emma, Waller, Elizabeth, and Harriett are all scholars.  Everyone as born in Yorkshire, Leeds.
-| [[Image:1871-england-census-yorkshire-leeds-nleeds-61.jpg|50px|center]]
 |-

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 ! Ref. Num. !! Description !! Image of original
 |-